Cases 71 - 80 of 81
Andrew Wenmoth v. Ovid Duncan, Jr.
as 09-7750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW D. WENMOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
OVID WESLEY DUNCAN, JR., Librarian, LARRY MCBRIDE, Correctional Officer II, KENNY AIKENS, Correctional Hearing Officer and others
MILLER et al v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv69308
Plaintiff:
BRAD W MILLER, BRAD W MILLER, ROBIN MILLER and others
Defendant:
ABEX CORPORATION, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Simons v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2009cv00487
Plaintiff:
Shireen Nalley Simons
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, Ninth Judicial District Court, Adult Drug Court and Robin Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Luther Miller, Jr.
as 09-10235
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LUTHER ROBIN MILLER, JR.
Scible v. Miller et al
as 5:2009cv00004
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Scible
Defendant:
Robin Miller, Sajay Tighe, James Gragg and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wenmoth v. Duncan et al
as 3:2008cv00182
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wenmoth
Defendant:
Ovid Wesley Duncan, Jr., Diana Robin Miller, Larry McBride and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
OSF Healthcare System v. Concert Health Plan Insurance Company et al
as 1:2008cv01328
Plaintiff:
OSF Healthcare System
Defendant:
Concert Health Plan Insurance Company, Ronald Miller and Robin Miller
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miller v. Cain
as 08-30875
Petitioner - Appellant:
DALE ROBIN MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
GORE v. MILLER
as 1:2008cv00499
Plaintiff:
CRAIG GORE
Defendant:
ROBIN MILLER
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bradley #127143 v. Gravelle et al
as 1:2008cv00063
Plaintiff:
William Bradley #127143
Defendant:
Carol Gravelle and Robin Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
