Cases 71 - 80 of 3,690
BOYKINS v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
RODERICK BOYKINS
Defendant:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, FNU LOCKLEAR, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Sentry Select Insurance Co
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Pamela D Rush
Defendant:
Sentry Select Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
RUSH v. MONSANTO COMPANY
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
LARRY RUSH
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boykins v. Scotland Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Roderick Boykins
Defendant:
Scotland Correctional Institution, FNU Locklear, Dean Locklear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Noonan et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Karan Terrell Rush
Defendant:
CO Patrick Noonan, Sgt Anderson, CO Juan Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Gardner v. Doe
as 5:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Erik Flountez Gardner
Defendant:
John Doe, Luke Henderson, Steve Rushing and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Burton et al
as 4:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Cody Allen Rush
Defendant:
Kendra Burton and Jammi Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Cody A. Rush
Defendant:
Brian Jenkins and Jim Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond v. Rayville et al
as 3:2023cv01810
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Rayville, Gary Gilley, Tyler Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
