Cases 71 - 80 of 122
Griffith v. Floyd County, Kentucky et al
as 7:2013cv00061
Plaintiff:
Amber Griffith
Defendant:
Floyd County, Kentucky, Roger Webb, Fishbaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunt et al v. Worldwide Mortgage Company et al
as 3:2013cv01544
Plaintiff:
Othorene Z Hunt and Kenya T Nobles
Defendant:
Worldwide Mortgage Company, MidFirst Bank , GMAC Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ward et al v. Pickett et al
as 4:2013cv01735
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Ward and Linda S. Ward
Defendant:
Gregory Alan Pickett , Penny Jane Pickett , Bobbie White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Branson S. Ward v. Sgt. Rich
as 5:2008cv01021
Defendant:
Santiago Godinez, Goodrich, Craig Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Branson S Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ra-Bey v. Armstrong et al
as 3:2012cv00361
Plaintiff:
Nu Akk Ah Ra-Bey
Defendant:
Donald E. Armstrong, Jr., Jennifer S Ward, Gina K. Calvert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv02198
Plaintiff:
Mary Ward and Jeffrey S. Ward
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02198
Plaintiff:
Mary Ward and Jeffrey S. Ward
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare Worldwide and others
Ward v. Hobbs
as 5:2012cv00223
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Plaintiff:
Joshua S Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JULIUS v. WARD
as 1:2012cv00943
Plaintiff:
TYRONE JULIUS
Defendant:
ARON S. WARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00993
Plaintiff:
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Defendant:
Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. , Orrstown Bank , Anthony F. Ceddia and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
