Cases 71 - 80 of 465
Jones v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al
as 3:2015cv00513
Plaintiff:
Khadi Jones
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co. , Nathaniel Ray and Does A, B, C and D
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hopfinger v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
as 2:2015cv04127
Plaintiff:
Scott Hopfinger
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Stinchfield v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
as 1:2015cv00032
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stinchfield
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCuistian v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al.
as 1:2015cv00279
Plaintiff:
Richard Warren McCuistian
Defendant:
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. , BRK Brands, Inc. and Sears Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kyles v. Sears Roebuck & Co et al
as 3:2015cv00151
Plaintiff:
Augustine Kyles
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co and Sears Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United Fabrics International Inc v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al
as 2:2015cv01298
Defendant:
599Fashion, Inc., BUY.COM, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
United Fabrics International Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
United Property et al v. A&E Factory Service, LLC et al
as 6:2014cv01987
Plaintiff:
United Property & Casualty Insurance Company , Alejandro Gonzalez and Haydee Cruz
Defendant:
A&E Factory Service, LLC and Sears, Roebuck & Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Newcomb et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2014cv00509
Plaintiff:
Edward Newcomb and Jeanine Newcomb
Defendant:
General Electric Company , Ingersoll Rand Company , Foster Wheeler Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
L.A. Gem & Jewelry Design, Inc. v. Overstock.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08756
Defendant:
Does, Overstock.com, Inc., Sears Holding Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
L.A. Gem & Jewelry Design, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
