Cases 71 - 80 of 324
MI Ed Assn Family Ret Stf Assn, et al v. Michigan Education Assn, et al
as 20-1174
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN EDUCATION SPECIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION, a Michigan nonprofit corporation, MICHIGAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, a union affiliated with local unions that represent public school employees and other employees in the state of Michigan and MEA FINANCIAL SERVICES, a Michigan corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHIGAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION FAMILY RETIRED STAFF ASSOCIATION, a Michigan nonprofit corporation, CAROLEE SMITH and GLENNA PARKER
Michigan Education Association Family Retired Staff Association et al v. Michigan Education Association et al
as 1:2019cv01074
Plaintiff:
Carolee Smith, Michigan Education Association Retired Staff Association, Glenna Parker and others
Defendant:
Michigan Education Association Special Services Association, MEA Financial Services, Michigan Education Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Hancock Mechanical LLC v. KP Engineering, LP et al
as 4:2019cv04584
3Rd Party Defendant:
CSI Compressco LP, Innovative Industrial Fabricators, LLC, The Reynolds Company and others
Defendant:
Targa Pipeline Mid-Continent Westtex, LLC, Brandon T. Steele, Targa Resources LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Hancock Mechanical, LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
KP Engineering, LP
Interpleader:
Spindletop Training & Industrial Resources LLC, Tyler Building Systems, L.P. and Daigle Automation Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Hancock Mechanical Welding and Fabrication
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv13298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hancock Mechanical LLC v. KP Engineering, LP et al
as 7:2019cv00204
Plaintiff:
Hancock Mechanical LLC d/b/a Hancock Mechanical Welding & Fabrication and Hancock Mechanical, LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
KP Engineering, LP
3Rd Party Defendant:
The Reynolds Company, Sunstate Equipment Company, LLC, Dealers Electrical Supply Co. and others
Counter Plaintiff:
Credos Fabrications, LLC, S&S Services, LLC, Innovative Industrial Fabricators, LLC and others
Defendant:
Targa Pipeline Mid-Continent WestTex LLC, Brandon T. Steele, Targa Gas Processing and others
Interpleader:
Spindletop Training & Industrial Resources LLC, Daigle Automation Inc. and Tyler Building Systems, LP
Counter Defendant:
Hancock Mechanical Welding and Fabrication
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Chavis v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
as 7:2019cv00153
Defendant:
Sammy's Auto Sales, Inc., Daicel Safety Tube Processing, Inc., Cox Family Automotive, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kristin D. Chavis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CANSLER et al v. KONDAUR CAPITAL CORPORATION et al
as 3:2019cv16540
Defendant:
WARREN JONES ESQ., HON. KATIE A. GUMMER, ROGELIO SORIA and others
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL CANSLER, CALVON SIMMONS, TRACEY M. CANSLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malcolm v. Rochester City School District
as 19-2409
Defendant / Appellee:
Sandra Simpson, Chief of Specialized Services and former Interim Director of Specailized Services, Individually, Barbara Deane-Williams, Superintendent of Schools, Individually, Mary Pauly, Executive Director of Specialized Services, Individually and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bernice Malcolm
Patel et al v. Central Utah Clinic et al
as 2:2019cv00542
Defendant:
Revere Health, Jonathan Bowman, Kane County Human Resources Special Service District and others
Plaintiff:
Minal Ashokkumar Patel and Dilipkumar Sitarambhai Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruben Valdez v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 19-16123
Defendant / Appellee:
L. WALLACE, Assistant Institutional Gang Investigator, CSP - Sacramento, SCOTT, TIM V. VIRGA, Warden, CSP - Sacramento and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUBEN VALDEZ
Defendant:
D. FOSTON, J. MAYHEW, Institutional Gang Investigator Lieutenant, CSP - Sacramento and D. STARK, Appeals Examiner, IAB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
