Cases 81 - 90 of 17,372
Israel v. Carter, et al.
as 24-1974
Plaintiff:
AKIVA AVIKAIDA ISRAEL
Defendant:
RUBY CARTER, SHAWNTEL SNOW, DAWN SANTOS and others
Ketcham v. City of Mount Vernon
as 24-825
Plaintiff:
RONALD KETCHAM
Defendant:
CITY OF MOUNT VERNON, JOHN DOES NUMBERED 12, MICHAEL HUTCHINS and others
Johnson et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv02465
Plaintiff:
Susie Johnson, Richard Young, Donnie Marshall and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Patterson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Eugene P Patterson
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, United States Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
In Re: AT&T Date Breach Litigation.
as 3:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Alex Petroski, Andrew March, Nicholas Nelli and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
In Re: AT&T Date Breach Litigation.
as TXN/3:24-CV-00757
Plaintiff:
Petroski, Alex Petroski, Andrew March and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
PATTERSON v. 360CONNECT, LLC
as 1:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
Brad Patterson
Defendant:
360Connect, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. The Estate of Randy Jordan et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Defendant:
Tarheel Realty, LLC, The Estate of Randy Jordan, National Civil, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Karimu Hamilton v. Christopher Flanagan, et al
as 24-1567
Plaintiff:
KARIMU HAMILTON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER B. FLANAGAN, ANDREW PANCOAST, KEVIN KOCHANSKI and others
Ivan McKinney v. Fitzgerald, et al
as 24-1552
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
SGT. FITZGERALD, OFFICER FORBES, GEORGE ROBINSON, Asst Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
