Cases 81 - 90 of 255
Linares v. Annucci et al
as 7:2019cv11120
Defendant:
Ellen E. Alexander, Erik Berliner, Tycee Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge L. Linares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2019cv00341
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Brandon Charles Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Ellis v. Circle K Stores Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv04940
Defendant:
Circle K Stores Incorporated, Kathleen M Morse, Charles Davis Hartz and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Micheal Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PC) Charles Davis v. Hanford Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv01204
Defendant:
Hanford Police Department and D.A.P.O.
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02224
Plaintiff:
Micky Brooks, Mark Gerasimas, Ranada Lowe and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
BAKER et al v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03250
Plaintiff:
MICKY BROOKS, MARK GERASIMAS, RANADA LOWE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States v. Davis
as 19-1292
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW CHARLES DAVIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DAVIS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv12325
Plaintiff:
MAGGIE FARMER, CHARLES DAVIS and THE ESTATE OF MAGGIE FARMER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2019cv10569
Defendant:
Stephen Woodcock, Joseph Gasper, Larry Biniecki and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis
Davis v. Whitmer et al
as 5:2019cv10881
Defendant:
Stephen Woodcock, Joseph Gasper, Larry Biniecki and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
