Cases 81 - 90 of 100
Brooks v. Evans et al
as 5:2011cv00154
Plaintiff:
Charles David Brooks
Defendant:
Timothy L Evans, Bobby D Hall, William B Teftiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell #434171 v. Howes
as 1:2011cv00519
Petitioner:
David Brooks Mitchell #434171
Respondent:
Carol Howes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. David Brook
as 10-6556
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID BROOKS
Estate of Dominic Petrolino by Robert Brooks v. Brooks et al
as 2:2009cv04196
Plaintiff:
Estate of Dominic Petrolino by Robert Brooks
Defendant:
Michael D. Brooks, David Brooks and Lorraine Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Winniger v. Lazard et al
as 6:2009cv01624
Plaintiff:
Carl Wininger, Sr.
Defendant:
James B. Lazard, Dobbins Gregory, David Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson et al v. Allen et al
as 2:2009cv00066
Plaintiff:
Albert Wilson, Rufus Barnes, David Brooks and others
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen and State of Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROY v. USA et al
as 3:2007cv05759
Plaintiff:
KAMAL K. ROY
Defendant:
USA, NASHUA TELEGRAPH AND NEWSPAPER, ANDREW WOLFE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roy v. Brooks
as 2:2007cv01924
Plaintiff:
Kamal K Roy
Defendant:
David Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cervantes v. Mcalheney et al
as 2:2007cv02551
Petitioner:
Ralph Michael Cervantes
Respondent:
Mcalheney, David Brooks and County of Placer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cervantes v. Placer County Superior Court et al
as 2:2007cv02550
Plaintiff:
Ralph Michael Cervantes
Defendant:
Placer County Superior Court, Mcalhaney, David Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
