Cases 81 - 89 of 89
Malloy v. Rowley et al
as 1:2008cv02303
Plaintiff:
Joseph Francis Malloy
Defendant:
John Rowley, Gary D. Maynard, J. Michael Stouffer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. USA
as 4:2008cv00318
Petitioner:
Joseph Francis Martin
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ARPAIO v. DUPRE et al
as 3:2008cv03548
Plaintiff:
AMBER ARPAIO
Defendant:
ASHLEY ALEXANDRA DUPRE, JOSEPH FRANCIS, MRA HOLDING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Dupre et al v. Koewing et al
as 1:2008cv21238
Plaintiff:
Ashley Alexandra Dupre
Defendant:
Joseph Francis, Cyrus Koewing, MRA Holding,LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Francis v. Goldsmith
as 4:2007cv03619
Plaintiff:
Christopher Joseph Francis
Defendant:
Brooks P Goldsmith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
ARONHIME V BYRN
as 08-1110
Appellee:
Aeri Park, David Andrew Coates, Henry Grant Morrison II and others
Appellant:
Guy Shambursky, Judith Aronhime, Ramy Lidor-Hada and others
Francis v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2007cv21695
Plaintiff:
Joseph Francis
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Field Office Director for Detention & Removal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moore et al v. Southwest Boston Senior Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10767
Plaintiff:
Christohper A. Moore and Mary Lou Moore
Defendant:
Southwest Boston Senior Services, Inc., Dale Mitchell, Mary Walker Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reid v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv00247
Petitioner:
Joseph Francis Reid
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff and David O. Streiff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
