Cases 81 - 90 of 114
BRYANT et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBREGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv62371
Plaintiff:
MATTHIE BRYANT and SHIRLEY R. BRYANT
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBREGLAS CORPORATION , ACANDS INCORPORATED , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boatman v. Madan et al
as 3:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Boatman
Defendant:
Elio Madan, P Gudino, Victor Selyutin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States of America v. Bryant
as 3:2010cv02271
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kimberly R Bryant
Garnishee:
Teacher Retirement System Of Texas
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Dunigan v. United States et al
as 2:2010cv02294
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dunigan
Defendant:
United States, People of Calif, Sacto Co Superior Ct and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Bryant et al
as 3:2010cv01654
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kimberly R Bryant
Garnishee:
Duncanville ISD
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Douglass et al v. Transocean Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02666
Plaintiff:
Charles Douglass , Annette Douglass , John Chandler Loupe and others
Defendant:
Transocean Holdings, Inc. , Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. , Transocean Deepwater, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. Mentor Corporation
as 3:2010cv00335
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth R. Bryant
Defendant:
Mentor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bryant v. Berkebile
as 5:2010cv00482
Petitioner:
Wayne R. Bryant
Respondent:
David Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boatman v. Le et al
as 2:2009cv00774
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Boatman
Defendant:
Bryan Le, S. E. Young, S. Cerdan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
