Cases 81 - 90 of 8,448
Tucker v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65226
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Tucker
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holtzinger v. Clerk Kevin R. Tucker
as 1:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
Patrick Landon Holtzinger
Defendant:
Clerk Kevin R. Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Caston v. Tucker
as 3:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Bernard B. Caston
Defendant:
Randy Tucker
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tucker v. City of Roanoke, Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Doris E. Tucker
Defendant:
City of Roanoke, Virginia and U.S. Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Vanbuskirk v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6070
Plaintiff:
AARON VANBUSKIRK, AUSTIN GUNTER and MELISSA GUNTER
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6069
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN GUNTER, MELISSA GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Tucker v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 4:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Freddie Tucker
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Tucker v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 5:2024cv10961
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Tucker
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Barack Obama, Donald J. Trump and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
