Cases 81 - 90 of 146
Campbell et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv21899
Plaintiff:
Deboroah Campbell and William Campbell
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Thomas, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00460
Plaintiff:
Michael William Campbell
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Campbell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv16306
Plaintiff:
Katie Campbell and William Campbell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMPBELL et al v. VANOVER et al
as 1:2014cv00626
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER CAMPBELL and WILLIAM CAMPBELL
Defendant:
RIVERSIDE TRANSPORT, INC and BARRY VANOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MELTON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2014cv00686
Plaintiff:
EDWIN L. MELTON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES AGENCY, PAMELA SONCINI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerber v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00674
Plaintiff:
Richard Gerber
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, PA Board of Probation and Parole, William Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. William Campbell
as 13-15405
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM CAMPBELL
Dakshesh Parikh, et al v. Citizens Medical Center, et al
as 13-41088
Plaintiff - Appellee:
M.D. DAKSHESH KUMAR PARIKH, M.D. HARISH CHANDNA and M.D. AJAY GAALLA
Intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID BROWN and DR. WILLIAM CAMPBELL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
