Cases 31 - 40 of 163,055
TOWN OF SILER CITY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00365
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AGC, INC., RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
TOWN OF SILER CITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
ZAHAN v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01872
Plaintiff:
EASRAT ZAHAN
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC, RASIER-PA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
TSURT LLC et al v. Various John Does et al
as 2:2024cv03635
Plaintiff:
TSURT, LLC and Pearl Jam, LLC
Defendant:
John Does, ABC Companies and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
John Doe v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv03574
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Annamalai v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
BOP, USA, S Holem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kolak v. Backerville, et al
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
WALTER M.J. KOLAK
Defendant:
DENISE BACKERVILLE, MR. CARTER, ARAPHAHOE SHERIFF, ARAPAHOE COUNTY and others
Pierre v. Yurchenko
as 24-1184
Plaintiff:
JEROLE PIERRE
Defendant:
Police Officer ALEXANDR YURCHENKO, Mayor ERIC ADAMS, Commissioner KEECHANT SEWELL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bailey v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 24-2798
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BAILEY
Defendant:
MULTNOMAH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MICHAEL REESE, CPT. ERIC P. SMITH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
