Cases 1 - 10 of 37
GABLE v. MCNEIL et al
as 4:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
CHADWICH GABLE
Defendant:
WALT MCNEIL and RYAN KESSLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMAS v. KESSLING et al
as 3:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. THOMAS
Defendant:
DAVID KESSLING and JANE M. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BLACKBURN v. MCNEIL et al
as 4:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Susan Blackburn
Defendant:
Walt McNeil, Corizon Health, Inc., Ryan Kessling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IRBY v. AMMERMAN et al
as 3:2020cv00196
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JEROME IRBY, JR.
Respondent:
BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, JOHN WETZEL, DAVID KESSLING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Legg et al v. Charleston Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv00023
Plaintiff:
Lee Robert Legg, Jr., Mason Carney, Shelbi Rea Legg and others
Defendant:
Charleston Police Department, "Kessle", Officer Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Fennell v. Francis Pirozzola, et al
as 19-3304
Defendant:
GARY BLAKELY, FRANCIS PIROZZOLA, KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT FENNELL
Watson v. Broward County Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2019cv61639
Defendant:
Sandi Digiamo, George Anthony, William Steers and others
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FENNELL v. PIROZZOLA et al
as 3:2019cv00097
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FENNELL
Defendant:
DAVID CLOSE, KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH, LONNIE OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Santos Bey v. Hightower et al
as 1:2018cv03039
Defendant:
Derrell Hightower, Brian Mcinerney, Judge Kessling and others
Plaintiff:
Erick Javier Santos Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santos Bey v. The State Of Maryland et al
as 1:2018cv02679
Defendant:
The State Of Maryland and Judge Kessling
Plaintiff:
Erick Javier Santos Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
