Cases 11 - 20 of 521
Heath v. Jeff
as 24-40085
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Lee Jeff, Ronald Page and David Davidison
Heath v. E-Comms et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
E-Comms and Candice Teer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
COOPER v. DIXON et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL L COOPER
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and HEATH HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Roy Devon Hill
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, Pat Labat, Lenwood Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Johnson et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell, Rick Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. FINKE et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
LARRANCE DURELLE MOORE
Defendant:
OKALOOSA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, OKALOOSA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, DAVID RICHARD FINKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bostic v. City of Sumter County Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Robert Lawrence Bostic, Robert L. Bostic and Robert Bostic
Defendant:
City of Sumter County Police Department, Jessica Hatchley, Hsath L. Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Saracina et al v. Haendiges et al
as 6:2024cv06005
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Saracina, Perez Authtry, Jason Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Deborah A. Haendiges, Shelia O'Sullivan Thie and John J. Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILES v. DAVIS et al
as 4:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW MILES
Defendant:
CHRISTI DAVIS, HEATH DAVIS, ADAM ELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarrow v. Orr
as 23-11195
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Jarrow
Defendant / Appellee:
Heath H Orr, Lieutenant of Correctional Officers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
