Cases 51 - 60 of 3,963
Heath v. E-Comms et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
E-Comms and Candice Teer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hill v. Johnson et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell, Rick Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Webster et al
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Quinton Webster, Titus Webster and Rodney Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Heath v. Horton et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Billy . Horton, Kaleh Adams and Kentrell Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Parte et al
as 2:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Kay Parte, DeAnn Parte and Stacy Davenport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Slater et al v. Buckner et al
as 6:2024cv03064
Plaintiff:
Joshua R Slater and Jermaine McDaniels
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Heath Cantrell, Smith Billy William and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Carillio
as 2:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Keyon Carillio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Heath v. Cole et al
as 1:2024cv10568
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Heath
Defendant:
Gary Charles Cole, Jr., Adrian Anderson and Oscoda, County of
Amaya et al v. Infinite Homes Group 646/500 LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Amaya, Luis Miranda and Moises Aleman
Defendant:
Infinite Homes Group 646/500 LLC, Infinite Homes Group 218 LLC, Infinite Homes Group 4108 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gerber Life Insurance Company v. Shavers et al
as 5:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Gerber Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Bryon Heath Shavers, Estate of Joe Bob Shavers Jr, Blake Shavers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
