Cases 71 - 80 of 3,963
Sanderson v. Reali et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dwight Sanderson
Defendant:
Kenneth M. Reali, Susan M. Stalnecker, William A. Hawkins, III and others
Helvey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange County)
as 6:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Heath Lee Helvey
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barb v. Heath Consultants, Inc
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
James Barb
Defendant:
Heath Consultants, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Brian Davis v. Randy Gibbs, et al
as 24-1014
Petitioner:
Brian Heath Davis
Respondent:
Randy Gibbs and Kris Karberg
Jason Edmonson v. Nikki Schwebke, et al
as 23-3417
Plaintiff:
JASON L. EDMONSON
Defendant:
NIKKI SCHWEBKE, HEATH TOMLIN, TONY EMIL and others
Samaritan Ministries International et al v. Kane
as 1:2023cv01091
Plaintiff:
Samaritan Ministries International, Zachary Cordel, Rachel Cordel and others
Defendant:
Alice T. Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MILES v. DAVIS et al
as 4:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW MILES
Defendant:
CHRISTI DAVIS, HEATH DAVIS, ADAM ELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Heath Zachary v. District Attorney Dauphin County, et al
as 23-3119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEATH ZACHARY
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Wetmore et al v. Brassfield et al
as 1:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Wetmore and Victory Strategies, LLC
Defendant:
Adam Heath Brassfield, Veronica Brassfield, Adam Brassfield, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
