Cases 1 - 10 of 879
Hawkins v. Mawhorr et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Kameron Hawkins
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff Dan Mawhorr, Conrad Dyer, Cody Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toledo et al v. Palafox et al
as 4:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Emma Ochoa Toledo and Edgar Casahonda
Defendant:
Andrew Palafox, Francisco Serrano, Nogales, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glafiro Gonzalez v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 2:2024cv01944
Plaintiff:
Glafiro Gonzalez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison, Warden USP Lompoc, Assistant Warden USP Lompoc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gutierrez-Valencia #091102 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Luis Gutierrez-Valencia
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Sean Malone, Julie Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dimas v. Warner
as 1:2024cv03044
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ochoa Dimas
Respondent:
Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Bryan Collier et al
as 4:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Marvin Young
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Amber K. Ochoa, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Moten v. Vieth et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Sharrod Moten
Defendant:
Vieth, Ochoa, Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ochoa v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
Walter Ochoa
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vasquez v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Fabio Ochoa Vasquez
Respondent:
Warden Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vasquez v. Swaney
as 2:2023cv00125
Petitioner:
Fabio Ochoa Vasquez
Respondent:
Warden Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
