Cases 1 - 10 of 1,820
Wingfield v. Clegg et al
as 1:2024cv02220
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Defendant:
Thomas Scott Clegg, Jeffrey Mann and Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
MADDOX v. USA
as 1:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
GARY EUGENE MADDOX, JR.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
LLT Management LLC v. Emory et al
as 4:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
LLT Management LLC
Defendant:
Dr. Theresa Swain Emory, Dr. Richard Lawrence Kradin and Dr. John Coulter Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Wilborn v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01985
Plaintiff:
William R. Wilborn
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Jason Young and Naylor Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddox, Jr. v. USA
as 5:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
William Edward Maddox, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Simmons v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv01880
Plaintiff:
Eric Simmons
Defendant:
Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler et al v. Chickasaw Nation Medical Center et al
as 6:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Donisha Butler
Defendant:
Chickasaw Nation Medical Center, Indian Health Services and Spring Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Burchfield v. Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Robert W Burchfield
Defendant:
Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility, Corporal Reece LNU, Nurse Jones LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
