Cases 41 - 50 of 143
United States v. Tanner Halverson-Weese
as 21-1967
Defendant / Appellant:
Tanner Jo Halverson-Weese, also known as Tanner Jo Halverson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Tanner et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 0:2021cv01021
Plaintiff:
David Tanner and Linda Tanner
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Conway, Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2021cv00205
Defendant:
Jimmy Weser, Conway, Arkansas, City of, Tanner Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Kaala D Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Criswell v. Evens et al
as 4:2021cv00179
Defendant:
Danny Worley, Josepha Bolling, Keith Whitley and others
Plaintiff:
Doral Lynn Criswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnhart et al v. Walker et al
as 4:2021cv00003
Plaintiff:
Steven Barnhart and Tanner Scheuerman
Defendant:
Stephen Walker and Joshuah Walker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gibson Marina, Inc. v. Boland et al
as 4:2020cv01576
Defendant:
Jeffrey Gumm, Henry Hedges, Michael Cantillon and others
Plaintiff:
Gibson Marina, Inc. doing business as Woodland Marina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Schleve v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2020cv00166
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Tanner C. Schleve
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Tanner v. Monsanto Company, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
David Tanner
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 pl
Crook v. Kelley, Director Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2020cv05056
Defendant:
Nurse Jasmine Trice, Sergeant Craig and Wendy Kelley, Director Arkansas Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Tanner Jai Crook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crook v. Craig et al
as 4:2020cv00306
Defendant:
Jasmine Trice, Craig, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Tanner Jai Crook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
