Cases 21 - 30 of 3,253
Tanner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02024
Plaintiff:
Charmane T. Tanner
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sullivan v. State of Montana, et al.
as 24-2682
Plaintiff:
RYAN PATRICK SULLIVAN
Defendant:
STATE OF MONTANA, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, OFFICER WOLD and others
Snedeker v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WAYNE SNEDEKER, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, ANJALI NANDI, DENISE MERTZ and others
McKoy v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Ronald McKoy
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, Raleigh Police Department and Tanner C. Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tanner-Smith v. State Farm General Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
Tania Haley and Nina L. Tanner-Smith
Defendant:
State Farm General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
232 West Mason LLC v. Jackson, City of, et al
as 5:2024cv11051
Plaintiff:
232 W MASON LLC
Defendant:
City of Jackson, a municipal corporation, Matthew Hagerty, Mark M. Porterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Larch v. Prosecuting Attorney et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Tanner Moren Eagle Larch
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanner v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv11050
Plaintiff:
Renee Elizabeth Tanner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moyle v. City of Princeton, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Mark Moyle
Defendant:
City of Princeton, Texas, Derek Borg and Brianna Chacon
Intervenor:
Matthew Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
