Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LOMBARDO v. EVANS et al
as 5:2024cv01999
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
BRANDON T. EVANS, JENNA MARIE PLISZAR, KEVIN SAMUEL SANTOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickenbottom v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Chandler Hickenbottom
Defendant:
Devin J. Anderson, Marcus Felton, 15 John Doe's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Butler v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Shaquan Butler, Robert L. Muray and Robert L. Murray
Defendant:
City of New York, 5 John Doe C.O., John Doe Capt. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deal v. AT&T, Inc., et al.
as 1:2022cv10355
Plaintiff:
David Deal
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., 15 John Doe Terrorists, AT&T Mobility LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Oro Capital Advisors, LLC et al v. Borror Construction Co., LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05087
Plaintiff:
Oro Springburne, LLC, Oro Silvertree, LLC, Oro RB SPE Owner, LLC and others
Defendant:
Tom Garske, John and Jane Does 1-15, John Doe Corporations 1-15, and John Doe Entities 1-15, Douglas Borror and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oro BRC4, LLC v. Silvertree Apartments, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04907
Defendant:
Karric South Apartments, Inc., Silvertree Apartments, Inc., Karric North Apartments, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Oro BRC4, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Microsoft Corporation v. Doe et al
as 1:2010cv00156
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation and Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
1 John Doe, 2 John Doe, 3 John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
HAQ et al v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HAQ, MORTHA HAQ, SAMMY HAQ and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROBERT KEEGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
