Cases 1 - 10 of 11,657
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Weeks v. Arkansas Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections, Thomas W Hurst, Brandon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
McGhee v. Meaux et al
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Xavier McGhee
Defendant:
Chief Investigator Danny Meaux, Judge Robert Arnold, Attorney At Law Gus Sermos and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Joint Base Andrews et al
as 8:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Kurt Alexander
Defendant:
Joint Base Andrews, Secretary Frank Kendall, Jason Stack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Gonzalez et al v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Evelin Gonzalez, Everardo Gonzalez and Arnold Gonzalez
Defendant:
Werner Enterprises, Inc. and Amirakel Alford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Castro v. Spreckels Sugar Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Arnold Samuel Castro
Defendant:
Spreckels Sugar Company, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Weems (PS) v. Arnold et al
as 1:2024cv01111
Plaintiff:
Tyra Weems
Defendant:
Monica Arnold, Tamieka Cottle, C Murder and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
