Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Boncher v. 3M Company et al
as 5:2024cv01403
Plaintiff:
Joyce Boncher
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Glenn Arthur Smith Jr. v. Amy Boncher et al
as 2:2024cv02459
Petitioner:
Glenn Arthur Smith Jr.
Respondent:
Amy Boncher and Collete S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wedington v. Boncher
as 24-1273
Petitioner:
CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON
Respondent:
AMY BONCHER, Warden, FMC Devens
Jordan v. Barves et al
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Charles Jerome Jordan
Defendant:
J. Barves, J. Pumphrey, Lt. Bardo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WRIGHT
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD, AMY BONCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanders v. Renaud et al
as 1:2024cv10165
Plaintiff:
Devon Sanders
Defendant:
Cheryl A. Renaud, Krystle Brown, Amy Boncher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mouzon v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv10911
Plaintiff:
Robbie Mouzon
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice, Carlett Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Michael T. Boncher v. Brown County et al
as 1:2023cv01187
Plaintiff:
Estate of Michael T. Boncher
Defendant:
Brown County, Wellpath LLC, Correct Care Solutions LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cockerham v. Boncher
as 23-1722
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOEL ANTHONY COCKERHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
AMY BONCHER
Bashir v. Holzapfel et al
as 5:2023hc02187
Petitioner:
El-Amin Bashir
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel and Warden A. Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
