Cases 1 - 10 of 795
Echols v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Terry Echols
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Moody v. Falkenrath et al
as 2:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Moody
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Billy Dunbar, Almalee Dittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Echols v. Koki Holdings America, Ltd. et al
as 2:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Richard Echols
Defendant:
Koki Holdings America, Ltd. and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Department of Health
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Jones
Defendant:
Department of Health, Eastern Louisiana Mental Health Systems, Turn Key Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALA Management, LLC v. Hall County, Georgia, et al
as 24-10618
Plaintiff:
ALA MANAGEMENT, LLC
Defendant:
HALL COUNTY, GEORGIA, a political subdivision of the State of Georgia, HALL COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, RICHARD HIGGINS, In their individual and official capacities as Hall County Commissioners and constituting the Hall County Board of Commissioners and others
United States of America v. 1039 Echols Drive, Frisco, Texas, 75306
as 2:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
1039 Echols Drive, Frisco, Texas, 75306
Claimant:
Feng Chen and Tianqiong Xu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Allard et al v. Bonneville Power Administration, et al
as 6:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allard, Vicki Allard, trustee of Allard Family Trust Dated May 8, 2013 and others
Defendant:
Joyce Marie Mills, Bonneville Power Administration, Eugene Water & Electric Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Bolden v. Raoul et al
as 4:2024cv04024
Plaintiff:
Donnell Bolden
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Heidi Epperson, Elaine Bochenek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
