Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 33,504
Howard v. USA
as 2:2024cv02098
Petitioner: Charles L Howard
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Howard v. Angiodynamics, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff: Kimberly Howard
Defendant: Angiodynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
v. GLUCK
as 8:2024cv05768
HOWARD et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2024cv00653
Plaintiff: JEFFREY HOWARD and CATHERINE HOWARD
Defendant: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howard v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff: Pamela Howard
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Guangzhou Nuolin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Norline v. Laltitude LLC d/b/a PicassoTiles et al
as 2:2024cv03539
Plaintiff: Guangzhou Nuolin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Norline
Defendant: Laltitude LLC d/b/a PicassoTiles and Howard Wang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Jennings v. Clarkson et al
as 3:2024cv03101
Plaintiff: Peter Jennings
Defendant: . Clarkson, . Howard, William Coonrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montemayor v. Big Spring Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00109
Plaintiff: Frank Montemayor
Defendant: Big Spring Police Department, Howard County Sheriffs Office, FNU Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forrester v. Dowdy et al
as 4:2024cv00197
Plaintiff: Jerry W Forrester
Defendant: Dowdy, Howard, Nips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
as 5:2024cv00219
Petitioner: Robert Lee Howard
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?