Cases 71 - 80 of 4,599
USA v. Tony Manns
as 24-5053
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TONY MANNS
Mann et al v. Cottrell et al
as 1:2024cv10135
Plaintiff:
Jasbir Mann, Rosemary Cote, Randy Spencer and others
Defendant:
Jonathan Cottrell, Rebecca Cottrell and Michael Bernier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Mann v. Sonesta International Hotels Corporation
as 4:2024cv10121
Plaintiff:
Susie Mann
Defendant:
Sonesta International Hotels Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mann v. Young et al
as 6:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Raymond William Mann
Defendant:
Michael Young, Jonathan Watkins and Bexar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bueno v. General Information Solutions, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Albert Bueno
Defendant:
General Information Solutions, LLC, Genuine Information Holdings, LLC, RWC Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Anderson, John v. York et al
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
John Mann Anderson
Defendant:
Nurse York, Sgt. Ewert, LT Tritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Tuten et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
John Mann Anderson
Defendant:
John J. Tuten, Cheryl Jeanpierre, Charles Dombeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mann v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00022
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Tennessee CVS Pharmacy, LLC and Daniel G. Kamin Dickson, LLC
Plaintiff:
Melba Faye Mann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
United States of America v. Nordlicht (Small)
as 24-46
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL SMALL
Defendant:
MARK NORDLICHT, DAVID LEVY, URI LANDESMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
