Cases 71 - 80 of 26,259
Clarence Britten v. Anthony Wills, et al
as 24-1547
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE BRITTEN
Defendant:
ANTHONY WILLS, Warden, CARRI MORRIS, Leading Social Worker, Menard CC and SHERRI BUETTNER, MHP, Menard CC
ANDERSON v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK
as 2:2024cv01425
Plaintiff:
JOHN MORRIS ANDERSON
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Morris v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01220
Plaintiff:
Harrold Morris
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Steele v. North Carolina Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2024ct03081
Plaintiff:
Colell B. Steele and Colell Barion Steele
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv30049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cardwell v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Duval F. Cardwell
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Major Mitchell, Major Rawlings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Lane Caviness, et al v. Atlas Air, Inc., et al
as 24-11033
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS, PATRICK AKERLUND, MICHAEL ALZATI and others
Defendant:
ATLAS AIR, INC. and FLIGHT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Palmer v. Swedish Match North America, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60522
Plaintiff:
Kovadis Palmer
Defendant:
Swedish Match North America, LLC and Philip Morris International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morris v. Pathlight Property Management
as 1:2024cv01419
Plaintiff:
Shanita Morris
Defendant:
Pathlight Property Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
