Cases 1 - 10 of 11,591
MACDONALD v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant:
DANIEL JOHNSON, BRUCE KILE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR and others
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carey et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01604
Plaintiff:
Jerome Carey and Sharon Carey
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Boards v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Carl R Webb II Boards and Carl Roy Webb II Boards
Defendant:
Loren, Arron Smith, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sakai v. Schiff
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Carey Sakai
Defendant:
Kim Teresa Schiff, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sutton Specialty Insurance Company v. NGE Transport LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Sutton Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
NGE Transport LLC, Norvin Ennis, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Brown v. Boone County Sheriffs Dept et al
as 2:2024cv04072
Plaintiff:
Ronald Elwood Brown
Defendant:
Boone County Sheriffs Dept, Dewayne Carey, Danielle Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carey v. USA
as 3:2024cv00722
Petitioner:
Jesse Carey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Warmboe et al v. Dickinson, County of
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Eric Warmboe
Defendant:
Dickinson, County of and Lorna Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
