Cases 41 - 50 of 3,831
Pass et al v. Berkel & Company Contractors, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Detraeon Pass and Devin Pass
Defendant:
Berkel & Company Contractors, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Institute of Devine Metaphysical Research v. Kinley-Davis
as 2:2024mc50209
Plaintiff:
Institute of Devine Metaphysical Research
Defendant:
Carla Kinley-Davis
Respondent:
Mikai Green, Esq.
Robinson v. State of Delaware
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Devin Robinson
Defendant:
State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yauch v. Schuette et al
as 2:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Devin R Yauch
Defendant:
RN Schuette, Michelle and JA LaCrosse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ometu v. City of San Antonio
as 24-50152
Plaintiff:
Mathias Ometu
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, William McManus, Chief of Police, Devin Day, Officer, Badge # 0490 and others
Floyd v. Saber Fitness Hegenberger, LLC
as 4:2024cv01278
Plaintiff:
Michael Devin Floyd
Defendant:
Saber Fitness Hegenberger, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Solberg et al v. Christian County, Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Solberg and Jessica Solberg
Defendant:
Christian County, Missouri, Sheriff Brad Cole, Darren Whisnant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY a/s/o TROY MAURICE HARRIS v. DEVINE et al
as 1:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY a/s/o TROY MAURICE HARRIS
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JUSTIN DEVINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Bradford v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Slyvester Bradford and Sylvester Bradford
Defendant:
Devin Taylor, Ogden City Police Department, Ogden City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
