Cases 61 - 70 of 205,157
Joel Muir v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-1754
Plaintiff:
JOEL GLASTON MUIR
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MR. J. HALL, MR. J. FREEMAN and others
1816 E. Wood Land Trust, et al v. Buddy Ford
as 24-11282
Plaintiff:
1816 E. WOOD LAND TRUST, ACM TRUST, AEGIS 13TH AVE TRUST and others
Defendant:
BUDDY DWIGHT FORD
Seiber v. Shelby County Government
as 2:2024cv02261
Plaintiff:
Mary E Seiber
Defendant:
Shelby County Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Alexander v. Alexander et al
as 0:2024cv01503
Plaintiff:
Jomari E. Alexander, Sr.
Defendant:
Mandy M. Alexander, Christy Kaster-Snow, Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wah v. Vargas et al
as 1:2024cv03146
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Hop Wah
Defendant:
Javier E. Vargas, Antonolla Papaloo, Nicole Wint-Baksh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Connolly v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03075
Plaintiff:
Migdalia E Connolly
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Star Colbert v. Dougan
as 24-1073
Plaintiff:
STAR COLBERT, ASSENAGON CREDIT SUBDEBT AND COCO, AXIOM EUROPEAN FINANCIAL DEBT FUND LIMITED, Individually and on Behalf of Other Credit Suisse Group AG AT1 Bondholders and others
Defendant:
BRADY W. DOUGAN, ERIC VARVEL, JAMES L. AMINE and others
Lettieri v. Garver
as 24-1074
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
RANDALL E. GARVER and MICHAEL MOCKWATER
Carl Rodgers v. Pennsylvania State Police, et al
as 24-1759
Plaintiff:
CARL E. RODGERS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JEFFREY STINE, DEAN SHIPE and others
Jasper Frazier v. Victoria Kuhn, et al
as 24-1736
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, Acting Commissioner, PATRICK NOGAN, Administrator, ANTHONY GONGI, Association Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
