Cases 41 - 50 of 257,176
BEAUCHAMP v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
KELLEY M BEAUCHAMP
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Murray et al v. Leblanc et al
as 3:2024mc00070
Plaintiff:
James Murray
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc
Petitioner:
Correct Commissary, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01258
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Balboa Capital Corporation v. Mitt Lary Family Practice, LLC
as 1:2024cv11151
Plaintiff:
Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
MALIKA ARYANPURE, Mitt Lary Family Practice, LLC and Does TERMINATED:
Other:
Andrew M Deutsch
Cross Defendant:
Cynosure LLC and Hologic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DAS v. IROBOT CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv11158
Plaintiff:
DYLAN DAS
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Colin M. Angle and JULIE ZEILER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CARR v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05746
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M CARR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra Race Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
