Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jackson v. Quick, et al.
as 24-1740
Plaintiff:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant:
JASON QUICK, Watch Commander at Madera County Jail, ELIZABETH ALVAREZ, CSU Officer at Madera County Jail, LISETTE LOPEZ, Mailroom Officer at Madera County Jail and others
ROSSETTE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01477
Petitioner:
BOBBY ROSSETTE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Cornel Jackson v. County of Madera, et al
as 22-16920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MADERA, a Municipality of the State of California, BRETT FRAZIER, DAVID ROGERS and others
KENJURA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23853
Plaintiff:
ROSSETTE KENJURA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. County of Madera, et al.
as 1:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Cornel Jackson
Defendant:
County of Madera, Brett Frazier, David Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Harris v. Stapp et al
as 1:2019cv01035
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, Peter J. Stapp, Heather Tsongoten and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell-Duane Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Skipper v. Rossett et al
as 2:2018cv10985
Defendant:
Fabrice Rossett and EAN Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ramsey F Skipper, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. Rossetter et al
as 0:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Charles Rossetter and Receivables Management Solutions, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Rossette et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv00508
Plaintiff:
Chistella Rossette and Robert Rossette
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
