Cases 1 - 10 of 345
Randolph Johnson v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6280
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH WAKEEM JOHNSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Andrew Randolph v. Matt Macauley
as 24-1202
Petitioner:
ANDREW MAURICE RANDOLF and ANDREW MAURICE RANDOLPH
Respondent:
MATT MACAULEY, Warden
Randolph v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00230
Petitioner:
Larry Randolph
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. McClain et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
James Leslie Bailey
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Randolph County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
D.W. v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 1:2024cv01870
Plaintiff:
D.W.
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission, Patricia K. Cushwa and Susan Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
LAMBERT v. RANDOLPH COUNTY COURT
as 1:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
BRANSON LAMBERT
Respondent:
RANDOLPH COUNTY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Randolph v. Keith et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Shawn Luke Randolph
Respondent:
Jessica Keith and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randolph v. Dzurendas
as 2:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Louis Randolph and Clyde Lewis
Respondent:
James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randolph v. Buckner
as 4:2023cv00369
Petitioner:
Joshua Randolph
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joseph Randolph Mays v. Brian Birkholz
as 2:2023cv03427
Petitioner:
Joseph Randolph Mays
Respondent:
Brian Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
