Cases 1 - 10 of 489
Trice v. Unknown et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Trice
Defendant:
Unknown, Chad Nixon, Matt Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRICE v. OMALLEY
as 5:2024cv01661
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHAWN TRICE
Defendant:
MARTIN OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tipton v. Rayford
as 24-50214
Plaintiff:
Charlton Reed Tipton
Defendant:
Phonso Rayford, Christopher Pauley, Captain, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Ruth E. Trice, Captain of Correctional Officers and others
Beck v. Catanzarite Law Corporation, et al.
as 24-1727
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN S. BECK
Defendant:
CATANZARITE LAW CORPORATION, STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, RUBEN DURAN and others
Trice v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
Kerra Trice
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Xlink Resource Group, LLC v. Expo Petroleum Oil and Gas, LLC, et al.
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Xlink Resource Group, LLC
Defendant:
Expo Petroleum Oil and Gas, LLC, Mayomi Olootu, James Uduak Ubom and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02882
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Mu Bey et al v. Trice et al
as 1:2023cv16591
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Mu Bey and Ardis M Canady
Defendant:
Nicole Trice and Joshua Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Trice v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
as 4:2023cv01473
Plaintiff:
Ryan G. Trice
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
