Cases 81 - 90 of 118
Stewart, Glendale v. Shinseki, Eric et al
as 3:2012cv00337
Plaintiff:
Glendale Stewart
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki, Employee Equal Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and America Federation of Government Employees Union (AFGE)
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
RS Contractors, LLC v. AFG Investment Fund 2 LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00191
Plaintiff:
RS Contractors, LLC
Defendant:
AFG Investment Fund 2 LLC and HW Burbank LLC
Counter_claimant:
HW Burbank LLC and AFG Investment Fund 2 LLC
Counter_defendant:
RS Contractors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. Union UAW AFGE AFL-CIO
as 2:2012cv10135
Plaintiff:
Simon Phillips
Defendant:
Union UAW AFGE AFL-CIO
Thornton v. AFGE Local 2274 et al
as 1:2011cv14684
Plaintiff:
Brian Kelly Thornton
Defendant:
AFGE Local 2274, Edward Mason, Ted Papesh and others
Freese et al v. USCIS Nebraska Service Center et al
as 4:2011cv03182
Defendant:
AFGE AFL-CIO, Marathon Properties and Star City Federal
Plaintiff:
Debra D. Freese and Stuart W. Freese
NSC:
USCIS Nebraska Service Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv23671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv02325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NANTAMBU v. B.O.P. et al
as 1:2011cv01216
Plaintiff:
DAMANI MUATA NANTAMBU
Defendant:
B.O.P., HARLEY LAPPIN, ERIC HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Latin Bakery Inc et al
as 1:2011cv22199
Plaintiff:
Philip Morris USA Inc.
Defendant:
Palmar Cafeteria Inc, Clara Martinez, Woodland Investments Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
