Cases 1 - 10 of 6,253
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Toddell Alexander v. USA
as 24-3408
Petitioner:
TODDELL ALEXANDER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alexander v. Correctional Managed Health Care et al
as 4:2024cv01709
Plaintiff:
Darrold Alexander
Defendant:
Correctional Managed Health Care, Dr. Lannette Linthicum, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. WC Dub Brassel Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Gordon Dean Pickens, Jr
Defendant:
WC Dub Brassel Detention Center, Lincoln County Detention Center, Steve Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. United States of America Probation Supervised Release et al
as 2:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Tavo Simmons
Respondent:
United States of America Probation Supervised Release, Natasha Alexander Mingo and Chante Pagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Jesus Jehovah v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6428
Plaintiff:
JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH, a/k/a Robert Gabriel Love, a/k/a Gabriel Alexander Antonio
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
