Cases 1 - 10 of 2,440
Alford v. Cambre and Associates, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Charity Alford
Defendant:
Cambre and Associates, LLC, Glenn Cambre and Candice Liverpool-Settle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Terrence Hammock v. Zowie Barnes
as 24-6375
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE EDWARD HAMMOCK, JR.
Defendant:
DR. ZOWIE BARNES, M.D., DIRECTOR GAIL WATTS, OFFICER J. SHERMAN and others
In re: Alford Robinson
as 24-5390
Petitioner:
In re: ALFORD D. ROBINSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alford v. McDonough
as 24-1720
Claimant:
LISA Y. ALFORD
Respondent:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Charles Crable v. City of Cleveland, OH, et al
as 24-3316
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. CRABLE
Defendant:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH, OFFICER ROBERT ALFORD, #510 and OFFICER ISAIAH PARKER, #1572
Aguirre v. Securus Technology et al
as 6:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Arnold Aguirre
Defendant:
Securus Technology, Ariel Burks, Unknown Pharr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alford v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65218
Plaintiff:
Shiela Alford
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alford v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01380
Petitioner:
Weylin W. Alford
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown et al v. County of Wayne et al
as 2:2024cv10779
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Brown, Tianna Hubbard, Rozia Robertson and others
Defendant:
County of Wayne and Officer Terri Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alford v. Hill Top Research Incorporated d/b/a Cliantha Research
as 8:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Michelle Alford
Defendant:
Hill Top Research Incorporated d/b/a Cliantha Research
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
