Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Alford v. Lovelace et al
as 2:2026cv01655
Plaintiff:
Robin O'Dell Alford
Defendant:
Greg Lovelace, Alabama Department of Corrections, John Q. Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alford v. USA
as 4:2026cv01452
Petitioner:
Stanley E. Alford
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alford v. Shoop et al
as 2:2026cv01117
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Alford
Defendant:
Tim Shoop, N. Maghee, U.L. Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Parole Board et al
as 2:2026cv13410
Plaintiff:
Faheim Abduel Lee
Defendant:
Parole Board, Michigan Department of Corrections, Livingston, County of and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Parker v. Alford et al
as 2:2026cv06616
Plaintiff:
Sherri Parker
Defendant:
Devin Alford and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Alford v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2026cv06113
Plaintiff:
Emberlynn Alford
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. MICHAEL et al
as 4:2026cv07131
Defendant:
ALFORD MICHAEL and STATE FARM LLOYDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Taylor v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2026cv01361
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
Jade Sullivan, . Alford, Nikki Rambo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lisle v. Hughes et al
as 1:2026cv01352
Plaintiff:
Steven D Lisle, Jr.
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, . Perez, . Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
