Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Janous v. Aramark Corporation
as 3:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Frank Donald Janous
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation a/k/a Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Corporation and Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SHAW v. ARAMARK CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv03640
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
LEE ANN SHAW
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 260
MERCER et al v. ARAMARK CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv02762
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MERCER and LEO FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ORCA USA, LTD. v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2018cv03272
Defendant:
ARAMARK, AVENDRA, LLC, GREGORY O YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
ORCA USA, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett Building Inc v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00041
Plaintiff:
Bennett Building Inc
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Sports and Entertainment LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hightower et al v. Aramark Corporation
as 1:2010cv00166
Plaintiff:
George W. Hightower and Hightower Foods, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. ARAMARK Corporation
as 2:2009cv14088
Plaintiff:
June M Williams
Defendant:
ARAMARK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type:
Contract
Martin's Stadium, Inc. v. Aramark Corporation
as 1:2009cv01142
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Martin's Stadium, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
ARAMARK CORPORATION v. SCHEFFER et al
as 2:2008cv02998
Plaintiff:
ARAMARK CORPORATION
Defendant:
ROBERT SCHEFFER and INSOURCING MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
National Tour Association, Inc. v. Aramark Corporation
as 5:2008cv00242
Plaintiff:
National Tour Association, Inc.
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Counter Claimant:
Aramark Corporation
Counter Defendant:
National Tour Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
