Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Jones v. Aludyne US LLC
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jones
Defendant:
Aludyne US LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gee v Tacoma Superior Court et al
as 3:2023cv05951
Plaintiff:
Kassidy Jo Gee
Defendant:
Tacoma Superior Court, Alexander James Bossinas, Jr, Alicia Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv01993
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jones
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Kevin Johnson and Jeremiah Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Buckingham Department of Corrections, Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2022cv00685
Petitioner:
Arthur Jones
Respondent:
Warden Buckingham Department of Corrections, Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. USA
as 1:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Woodside Auto Parts, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv06294
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jones
Defendant:
Woodside Auto Parts, LLC and David Myones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones v. Brannon et al
as 4:2022cv04105
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jones
Defendant:
Christine N Brannon, Ross D Ford, Jamar A Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Uttecht
as 3:2022cv05371
Plaintiff:
Martin Arthur Jones and Martin A Jones
Defendant:
Jeffrey Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Interstate Service Provider, Inc. v. Jordan et al
as 4:2021cv00267
Defendant:
Michael Minniear, Ramone Smith, Billy Wilks and others
Plaintiff:
Interstate Service Provider, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Interstate Service Provider, Inc. v. Jordan et al
as TXE/4:21-CV-00267
Plaintiff:
Interstate Service Provider, Inc.
Defendant:
Jordan, Michael Minniear, Ramone Smith and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
