Cases 71 - 80 of 579
ANDERSEN v. AT&T CORP.
as 1:2020cv00643
Plaintiff:
JULIA G. ANDERSEN
Defendant:
AT&T CORP. and AT&T CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Lorenzo Quintana v. Branch Banking and Trust
as 20-1679
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORENZO QUINTANA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
BB&T CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellee:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Adrian N. Gomez et al v. AT&T Corporation
as 2:2020cv05381
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and AT&T Corporation
Plaintiff:
Adrian N. Gomez and Norma R. Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00836
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00325
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
DESTIN WATER USERS INC v. LEE ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO et al
as 3:2020cv05392
Plaintiff:
DESTIN WATER USERS INC
Defendant:
AT&T CORPORATION and LEE ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-1055
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01230
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Eric Rambert v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 20-1593
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN ST. VINCENT, DIRECTOR OF POLICY PLANNING, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, DOUGLAS M. WECK, JR. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Eugene Korte v. State of California, et al
as 20-15305
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T CORPORATE OFFICE, MARIE EUBANKS, SHAHROKH BAKHTYARI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUGENE KORTE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
