Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shymansky v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al
as 1:2026cv06160
Plaintiff:
Demia Shymansky
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, MAYOR ERIC ADAMS, Mayor Zohran Mamdani and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02253
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Abbas Jafari v. Beckman Coulter, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv02000
Plaintiff:
Abbas Jafari
Defendant:
Beckman Coulter, Inc., Danaher Corporation and Gaylen Robert Laudie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lalani v. China Pak Investment Limited et al
as 4:2026cv05217
Plaintiff:
Amin Lalani
Defendant:
China Pak Investment Limited (a/k/a CPIC Global), China Pak Investment UK Marketing Limited (a/k/a CPIC UK Marketing Ltd), One Hills Two SMC (Private) Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SEKH v. Mullin et al
as 2:2026cv00776
Plaintiff:
ABBAS SEKH
Defendant:
Secretary Markwayne Mullin and Rodney S Scott
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
