Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,532
Adams v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00625
Plaintiff: Elroy Joshua Adams
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Cahill, Christopher A McLaurin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villamor v. Metcalfe et al
as 2:2024cv00940
Plaintiff: Chadwick Fabian Villamor
Defendant: Officer J. Metcalfe, Officer D. Ketring, Officer A. Bookman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Adams
as 6:2024cv00012
Plaintiff: Daniel Alonzo Myers
Defendant: Warden Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams, Jr. v. Ogle et al
as 4:2024cv00817
Petitioner: Sylvester Williams, Jr.
Respondent: Adam Ogle and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams-Clark v. McClelland et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff: Adam Y. Williams-Clark
Defendant: Chief Judge Troy Russell McClelland and City of Cumming, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Precythe et al
as 4:2024cv00680
Plaintiff: Desmond Arnez Mills
Defendant: Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adames v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00319
Petitioner: Alexander Adames
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Criner v. Adams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff: Phillip Criner
Defendant: Richard Adams, Samuel Snyder and CO I John Doe Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Flores v. USA
as 24-1838
Petitioner: ADAM B. FLORES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kohute v. Adams
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff: Kevin James Kohute
Defendant: Lankston Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?