Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
United States of America v. $980,050.00 United States Currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00363
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $980,050.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Claimant: Ahmed Alrumaihi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. 15418 Hampshire Lane, Savage, Minnesota et al
as 0:2022cv00154
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 15418 Hampshire Lane, Savage, Minnesota, 5594 Candy Cove Trail SE, Prior Lake, Minnesota, 5604 Candy Cove Trail SE, Prior Lake, Minnesota and others
Claimant: Abdiaziz Farah, Salim Said, Abdi Nur Salah and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. Currency $31,414 et al
as 2:2018cv12861
Defendant: Currency $76,879.61 from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account No. 965840820, Currency $2,559.71 from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account No. 2974580629, Currency $885.07 from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account No. 786002154 and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: FARES YASIN, Nura Yasin, Michigan Home Visiting Physicians and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. $81,963.74 from American First National Bank Account No. 1050809603 et al
as 1:2017cv02894
Defendant: $81,963.74 from American First National Bank Account No. 1050809603, All Funds up to $50,000.00 held in Intrust Bank Account No. 99880485, $97,083.00 from Hanmi Bank Account No. 1904739 and others
Plaintiff: USA
Claimant: Raza Ahmmed , SGP Trading Inc , Fakhruddin Dean Gheewalla and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. SIX THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED SEVENTY TWO DOLLARS AND SEVENTY THREE CENTS ($6,872.73) IN FUNDS FROM ACCOUNT #XXXXXX2357 IN THE NAME OF AMNSS INC./DESHI BAZAR AT PNC BANK; et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv14023
Defendant: SIX THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED SEVENTY TWO DOLLARS AND SEVENTY THREE CENTS ($6,872.73) IN FUNDS FROM ACCOUNT #XXXXXX2357 IN THE NAME OF AMNSS INC./DESHI BAZAR AT PNC BANK;, THREE THOUSAND SEVEN DOLLARS AND EIGHTY THREE CENTS ($3,007.83) IN FUNDS FROM ACCOUNT #XXXXX8075 IN THE NAME OF AMNSS INC. AT PNC BANK and FORTY THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FIFTY SIX DOLLARS ($40,656.00) IN U.S. CURRENCY
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Nazir Ahmed , Mustak Ahmed and Ali Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
USA v. $34,902.01 Seized from Union Savings Bank Account Number XXXXX7739 et al
as 3:2015cv00246
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: $34,902.01 Seized from Union Savings Bank Account Number XXXXX7739, $15,680.43 Seized from Wells Fargo Advisors Account Number XXXX8310 and Parcel of Property Located at 1 Chard Road, New Milford, Connecticut
Claimant: Alexander Halim, Maria Batista and Ahmed Abdel-Halim
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $17,242.00 in U.S. Currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01295
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $17,242.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant: Adel Ahmed Fadel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Dahmash's Personal Property, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2014cv00021
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: Dahmash's Personal Property, A 2011 Toyota RAV4 and $11,845.45 in U. S. Currency
Claimant: Mohammed Ahmed Ahmed Dahmash
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $91,639.70 in U.S. Currency
as 1:2013cv03541
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $91,639.70 in U.S. Currency
Claimant: Zaheer Ahmed , Dermik and Aydin LLC , Dermik Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $8,820.00 et al
as 5:2013cv00072
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $8,820.00 and $1,940.00
Claimant: Ahmed Alwisha and A & H Quick Markets Corporation
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?