Cases 1 - 10 of 41
McCarver (PS) v. Lapham et al
as 1:2026cv00089
Plaintiff:
Marcus McCarver
Defendant:
Michael Lapham, Maxwell Feldman, Cory Knop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Johnson et al
as 8:2025cv00674
Plaintiff:
Kurtis Kelly
Defendant:
Deputy Alex Johnson, Deputy Nick Richards and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jacob Alex Johnson v. Shannon D. Dicus et al
as 5:2025cv02846
Plaintiff:
Jacob Alex Johnson
Defendant:
Shannon D. Dicus, M. Simpson, Anonymous Deputies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dougherty v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00875
Defendant:
Alex Johnson
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dougherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Moses v. Central State University et al
as 2:2024cv03130
Defendant:
Morakinyo Kuti, Central State University Board of Trustees, Pamela Bowman and others
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Moses, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson (PS) v. Kit Carson County Court
as 1:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
Jacob Alex Johnson
Respondent:
Kit Carson County Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Kit Carson County Court
as 24-1002
Petitioner:
JACOB ALEX JOHNSON
Respondent:
KIT CARSON COUNTY COURT
Johnson (PS) v. Kit Carson County Court
as 1:2023cv02662
Petitioner:
Jacob Alex Johnson
Respondent:
Kit Carson County Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Ector County Sheriff's Office
as 7:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jacob Alex Johnson
Defendant:
Ector County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Woelfel et al
as 2:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gill, Sr
Defendant:
Jordan Woelfel, S Enneper, Alex Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
