Cases 11 - 20 of 27,364
Xen Saquic, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2929
Petitioner:
JOSSELINE CLARISA XEN SAQUIC and MANUEL ESTEBAN ALEXANDER CONOZ XEN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Panelli v. Target Corporation
as 3:2024cv02748
Plaintiff:
Alexander Panelli
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Elias v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 7:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Justin Alexander Elias
Defendant:
Dale Ray Kirkpatrick and Heartland Motor Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Alexander v. Correctional Managed Health Care et al
as 4:2024cv01709
Plaintiff:
Darrold Alexander
Defendant:
Correctional Managed Health Care, Dr. Lannette Linthicum, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Alexander et al
as 2:2024cv02302
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ricardo Smith
Defendant:
Virginia M. Alexander, Robert Duck and Janeen R. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pickens v. WC Dub Brassel Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Gordon Dean Pickens, Jr
Defendant:
WC Dub Brassel Detention Center, Lincoln County Detention Center, Steve Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle et al v. The Hartford
as 3:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alexander Doyle and Frances Elizabeth Henslee
Defendant:
The Hartford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - ERISA
Simmons v. United States of America Probation Supervised Release et al
as 2:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Tavo Simmons
Respondent:
United States of America Probation Supervised Release, Natasha Alexander Mingo and Chante Pagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
