Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ellis v. Fail Telecommunication Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv03021
Plaintiff:
Sean Wesley Ellis
Defendant:
Fail Telecommunication Corporation, Christa Alexander, Donna Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
ROMANENKO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01444
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER PHILLIP ROMANENKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. USA
as 0:2020cv01425
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tyice Alexander Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
General Insurance Company of America v. Pete Norton et al
as 8:2018cv01381
Defendant:
Alexander Phillips, Ian Phillips, Eliza Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
General Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moss v. Randolph County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2017cv00557
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Moss
Defendant:
Randolph County Jail, Alexander Phillip, Cirby Bassit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01726
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Phillips v. Principal Life Insurance Company
as 4:2010cv01092
Plaintiff:
Alexander Phillips
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Allstate Ins Co v. Kurkjian et al
as 3:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
Allstate Ins Co and Allstate Ins Co
Defendant:
Jay Kurkjian and Alexander Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Alexander Phillips, et al. v. A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-83450
Defendant:
A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont
Plaintiff:
Alexander Phillips
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
