Civil Rights Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04230
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Andrew King v. Jason Utt
as 22-1051
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDREW KING
Defendant / Appellee: JASON K. UTT, individually and in his capacity as agent and employee of the City of New Martinsville, FRIEND ESTEP, individually and in his capacity as agent and employee of the City of New Martinsville and CITY OF NEW MARTINSVILLE, a West Virginia political subdivision
King v. Utt et al
as 5:2021cv00171
Plaintiff: Andrew King
Defendant: Jason K. Utt, Friend Estep and City of New Martinsville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING et al v. TOWN OF DANVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 1:2015cv00252
Defendant: JAMES HILTON and TOWN OF DANVILLE, INDIANA
Plaintiff: JENNIFER LYNNE KING and NICHOLAS ANDREW KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
SHAH v. SOUTH RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2011cv05682
Plaintiff: JULIA SHAH
Defendant: SOUTH RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT, WESLEY SANCHES, JOSEPH GREKOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02982
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv01857
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hirsch v. Mathews et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00134
Plaintiff: Arthur Hirsch
Defendant: William Mathews , Sandra Tucker , Ricky Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv05986
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?