Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Vinayagam v. Pierce et al
as 3:2022cv05281
Plaintiff:
Nithya Vinayagam
Defendant:
Andrew Pierce, Pierce Shearer LLP, Scott M. Berman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nutrien AG Solutions, Inc. v. Pierce
as 1:2021cv00078
Defendant:
Andrew Pierce
Plaintiff:
Nutrien AG Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaylor v. County of Santa Cruz et al
as 1:2019cv02024
Defendant:
Andrew Pierce, William James Rahal, Michael Maxwell and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Kaylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maxwell v. Kaylor et al
as 5:2019cv07832
Defendant:
"Amanda" Edmondson, Cindia Boyle, Roy Kaylor, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv17262
Plaintiff:
CHERYL PIERCE and ANDREW PIERCE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. ( F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC.), JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce, et al. v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2019cv11375
Plaintiff:
Martha Pierce and Andrew Pierce
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv01858
Defendant:
Omprakash Pillai, Colleen Gallagher, Scott Semple and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCullough et al v. Pierce et al
as 5:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
Lynn McCullough and William McCullough
Defendant:
Andrew Pierce and AP Electrical Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Omprakash
as 16-4203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andrew Pierce
Defendant - Appellee:
Pillai Omprakash, Doctor
Pierce v. Omprakash
as 3:2014cv01477
Plaintiff:
Andrew Pierce
Defendant:
Pillai Omprakash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
