Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Angiodynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec, Inc.
as 12-4364
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Angiodynamics, Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Biolitec, Inc.
AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AG, et al
as 12-2044
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANGIODYNAMICS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
BIOLITEC AG, WOLFGANG NEUBERGER, BIOLITEC, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cirrex Systems LLC v. Angiodynamics Inc.
as 1:2012cv01767
Plaintiff:
Cirrex Systems LLC
Defendant:
AngioDynamics Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Izquierdo-Garcia et al v. AngioDynamics, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01175
Plaintiff:
Arlene Izquierdo-Garcia and Michael McQueeny-Keese
Defendant:
AngioDynamics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America et al v. Angiodynamics, Inc (TV3)
as 3:2011cv00556
Intervenor_plaintiff:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
State of California , State of Colorado , State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
Angiodynamics, Inc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Lopresti v. Bioniche Pharma Group, Ltd. et al
as 8:2010cv02866
Plaintiff:
Rosalie Lopresti
Defendant:
Bioniche Pharma Group, Ltd. , Bioniche Teo , Angiodynamics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Angiodynamics, Inc.
as 3:2010cv04065
Plaintiff:
Kaidyn Moore
Defendant:
Angiodynamics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AngioDynamics Inc. v. Vascular Solutions Inc.
as 0:2010cv03601
Plaintiff:
AngioDynamics Inc.
Defendant:
Vascular Solutions Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Vascular Solutions Inc.
Counter_defendant:
AngioDynamics Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec AG et al
as 3:2009cv30181
Plaintiff:
AngioDynamics, Inc.
Defendant:
Biolitec AG and Wolfgang Neuberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
